<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Hits Back: Ad Says McCain Taking Low Road</title>
	<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road</link>
	<description>Control Congress is a multi-partisan, issue-oriented political forum that brings together the Left, Right, and everyone in between.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76953</link>
		<dc:creator>Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76953</guid>
		<description>There's no need to call Obama names.  He is flawed in every facet of the presidential race.  Even IF he had a single intelligent position on a single issue, Americans still won't vote for him because it is clear to anyone who isn't sucked in by his Pied Piper's flute that he doesn't really like the United States of America.  No matter how "progressive" the mainstream gets, our people still love the country and want a leader who loves it as much as they do.  I'm  sorry, but America is not a mean, ugly place.  There is no reason to be ashamed of our country.  It's the best damn country the world's ever seen and America still loves a winner.  McCain isn't my first choice, not even my second or third, but at least he's an American patriot who'll see that America remains a winner.  You may think that my saying that the Obama's are about as sharp as marbles is the same as calling them names . . . I just think it's fitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no need to call Obama names.  He is flawed in every facet of the presidential race.  Even IF he had a single intelligent position on a single issue, Americans still won&#8217;t vote for him because it is clear to anyone who isn&#8217;t sucked in by his Pied Piper&#8217;s flute that he doesn&#8217;t really like the United States of America.  No matter how &#8220;progressive&#8221; the mainstream gets, our people still love the country and want a leader who loves it as much as they do.  I&#8217;m  sorry, but America is not a mean, ugly place.  There is no reason to be ashamed of our country.  It&#8217;s the best damn country the world&#8217;s ever seen and America still loves a winner.  McCain isn&#8217;t my first choice, not even my second or third, but at least he&#8217;s an American patriot who&#8217;ll see that America remains a winner.  You may think that my saying that the Obama&#8217;s are about as sharp as marbles is the same as calling them names . . . I just think it&#8217;s fitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captain_menace</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76946</link>
		<dc:creator>captain_menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76946</guid>
		<description>Aubrey, I hope you're prepared to take a beating over the next four years.

The truth is that your party screwed things up royal.

Calling the competition a bunch of names will only insure that your views are completely disregarded... and that may not be a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aubrey, I hope you&#8217;re prepared to take a beating over the next four years.</p>
<p>The truth is that your party screwed things up royal.</p>
<p>Calling the competition a bunch of names will only insure that your views are completely disregarded&#8230; and that may not be a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Rear</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76885</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Rear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76885</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Aubrey&lt;/b&gt;,

Let me get this straight: You actually read Michelle Obama's thesis?

Why? Is she running for something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Aubrey</b>,</p>
<p>Let me get this straight: You actually read Michelle Obama&#8217;s thesis?</p>
<p>Why? Is she running for something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76877</link>
		<dc:creator>Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76877</guid>
		<description>How is he smart?  Name three things that lead you to believe he's an intelligent individual.  Hell, I'll be all the French he even knows is "mercy bowcoo."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is he smart?  Name three things that lead you to believe he&#8217;s an intelligent individual.  Hell, I&#8217;ll be all the French he even knows is &#8220;mercy bowcoo.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnKonop</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76870</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKonop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76870</guid>
		<description>Aubrey

I may disagree with Obama on issues but he is a very smart guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aubrey</p>
<p>I may disagree with Obama on issues but he is a very smart guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76869</link>
		<dc:creator>Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76869</guid>
		<description>No way!  Obama is NOT an intelligent individual!  Why on earth would McCain want any advice from Obama?  I'm sorry, but Both Barry and Michelle strike me as less than Ivy League material.  REad Michelle's thesis!  It's horribly written and is nothing but p.c. b.s.  Just listen to them speak for Pete's sake!  Sorry, but some people aren't that smart.  It may be nice if we lived in a world where everyone rated a genuis and ideas were all brilliant . . . that's just not reality.  

Did you hear the EIGHT minutes of "UHs" that Rush was able to cut out of his press conference in the Mid-East(?)?  Go visit any speack teacher and ask if Obama is the model for eloquence.  

When you add in his idiotic positions . . . holy crap, how can anyone with a brain think he'd make a good garbage man, much less the pres.?

I guess the Pied Piper's call only affects some people and they can't help but follow him.  BAAAA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way!  Obama is NOT an intelligent individual!  Why on earth would McCain want any advice from Obama?  I&#8217;m sorry, but Both Barry and Michelle strike me as less than Ivy League material.  REad Michelle&#8217;s thesis!  It&#8217;s horribly written and is nothing but p.c. b.s.  Just listen to them speak for Pete&#8217;s sake!  Sorry, but some people aren&#8217;t that smart.  It may be nice if we lived in a world where everyone rated a genuis and ideas were all brilliant . . . that&#8217;s just not reality.  </p>
<p>Did you hear the EIGHT minutes of &#8220;UHs&#8221; that Rush was able to cut out of his press conference in the Mid-East(?)?  Go visit any speack teacher and ask if Obama is the model for eloquence.  </p>
<p>When you add in his idiotic positions . . . holy crap, how can anyone with a brain think he&#8217;d make a good garbage man, much less the pres.?</p>
<p>I guess the Pied Piper&#8217;s call only affects some people and they can&#8217;t help but follow him.  BAAAA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnKonop</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76808</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKonop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76808</guid>
		<description>Captain

I agree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captain</p>
<p>I agree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captain_menace</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76784</link>
		<dc:creator>captain_menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76784</guid>
		<description>For once it would be nice if a candidate were to say:

"Look, my opponent is a smart fellow, and you can rest assured that after I beat him in the election I will listen to him, and his supporters, to help me guide this nation."

I'd welcome this from either candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For once it would be nice if a candidate were to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;Look, my opponent is a smart fellow, and you can rest assured that after I beat him in the election I will listen to him, and his supporters, to help me guide this nation.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d welcome this from either candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Rear</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76772</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Rear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76772</guid>
		<description>As Sen. Clinton learned to her dismay, attacking Sen. Obama doesn't work.

Keep it up, Sen. McCain, keep it up.  That way we can be sure of a landslide!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Sen. Clinton learned to her dismay, attacking Sen. Obama doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Keep it up, Sen. McCain, keep it up.  That way we can be sure of a landslide!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnKonop</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76731</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKonop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/2008-election/barack-hits-back-ad-says-mccain-taking-low-road#comment-76731</guid>
		<description>WaPo: McCain's Troop Attack Just Wrong

WP-The mainstream media has been reluctant to call McCain's "Troops" attack ad what it is -- false. But the Washington Post devotes three pages to debunking the charge in a front page story today:

For four days, Sen. John McCain and his allies have accused Sen. Barack Obama of snubbing wounded soldiers by canceling a visit to a military hospital because he could not take reporters with him, despite no evidence that the charge is true. 

The attacks are part of a newly aggressive McCain operation whose aim is to portray the Democratic presidential candidate as a craven politician more interested in his image than in ailing soldiers, a senior McCain adviser said. They come despite repeated pledges by the Republican that he will never question his rival's patriotism.

The essence of McCain's allegation is that Obama planned to take a media entourage, including television cameras, to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany during his week-long foreign trip, and that he canceled the visit when he learned he could not do so. "I know that, according to reports, that he wanted to bring media people and cameras and his campaign staffers," McCain said Monday night on CNN's "Larry King Live."

The Obama campaign has denied that was the reason he called off the visit. In fact, there is no evidence that he planned to take anyone to the American hospital other than a military adviser, whose status as a campaign staff member sparked last-minute concern among Pentagon officials that the visit would be an improper political event.

...

Despite serious and repeated queries about the charge over several days, McCain and his allies continued yesterday to question Obama's patriotism by focusing attention on the canceled hospital visit. 


Read the whole thing.

The New York Times , meanwhile, publishes an editorial calling the ad "a false account of what occurred."

UPDATE: McCain's campaign seems to be backing off some of their more spurious charges. Ben Smith reports: 

McCain's camp, accused in the New York Times and the Washington Post this morning of distorting Obama's canceled trip to a military hospital in German, seems to have backed off the core of the charge: That he canceled the trip because "the Pentagon wouldn't allow him to bring cameras." 

"It does now seem that Barack Obama snubbed the troops for reasons other than a lack of photo-op potential," writes McCain blogger Michael Goldfarb this morning, contradicting his campaign's televised ads and his candidate's statements.

But as the media swings around to contradict McCain's story, the campaign is trying to stay on offense, blaming the press for the confusion:

"[T]he initial reports were less clear," Goldfarb writes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WaPo: McCain&#8217;s Troop Attack Just Wrong</p>
<p>WP-The mainstream media has been reluctant to call McCain&#8217;s &#8220;Troops&#8221; attack ad what it is &#8212; false. But the Washington Post devotes three pages to debunking the charge in a front page story today:</p>
<p>For four days, Sen. John McCain and his allies have accused Sen. Barack Obama of snubbing wounded soldiers by canceling a visit to a military hospital because he could not take reporters with him, despite no evidence that the charge is true. </p>
<p>The attacks are part of a newly aggressive McCain operation whose aim is to portray the Democratic presidential candidate as a craven politician more interested in his image than in ailing soldiers, a senior McCain adviser said. They come despite repeated pledges by the Republican that he will never question his rival&#8217;s patriotism.</p>
<p>The essence of McCain&#8217;s allegation is that Obama planned to take a media entourage, including television cameras, to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany during his week-long foreign trip, and that he canceled the visit when he learned he could not do so. &#8220;I know that, according to reports, that he wanted to bring media people and cameras and his campaign staffers,&#8221; McCain said Monday night on CNN&#8217;s &#8220;Larry King Live.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Obama campaign has denied that was the reason he called off the visit. In fact, there is no evidence that he planned to take anyone to the American hospital other than a military adviser, whose status as a campaign staff member sparked last-minute concern among Pentagon officials that the visit would be an improper political event.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Despite serious and repeated queries about the charge over several days, McCain and his allies continued yesterday to question Obama&#8217;s patriotism by focusing attention on the canceled hospital visit. </p>
<p>Read the whole thing.</p>
<p>The New York Times , meanwhile, publishes an editorial calling the ad &#8220;a false account of what occurred.&#8221;</p>
<p>UPDATE: McCain&#8217;s campaign seems to be backing off some of their more spurious charges. Ben Smith reports: </p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s camp, accused in the New York Times and the Washington Post this morning of distorting Obama&#8217;s canceled trip to a military hospital in German, seems to have backed off the core of the charge: That he canceled the trip because &#8220;the Pentagon wouldn&#8217;t allow him to bring cameras.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;It does now seem that Barack Obama snubbed the troops for reasons other than a lack of photo-op potential,&#8221; writes McCain blogger Michael Goldfarb this morning, contradicting his campaign&#8217;s televised ads and his candidate&#8217;s statements.</p>
<p>But as the media swings around to contradict McCain&#8217;s story, the campaign is trying to stay on offense, blaming the press for the confusion:</p>
<p>&#8220;[T]he initial reports were less clear,&#8221; Goldfarb writes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
