<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Religious Test for Public Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office</link>
	<description>Control Congress is a multi-partisan, issue-oriented political forum that brings together the Left, Right, and everyone in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:07:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/comment-page-1#comment-29924</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office#comment-29924</guid>
		<description>*yawn*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*yawn*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GimmeaBreak</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/comment-page-1#comment-29866</link>
		<dc:creator>GimmeaBreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office#comment-29866</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s**</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s**</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GimmeaBreak</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/comment-page-1#comment-29865</link>
		<dc:creator>GimmeaBreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office#comment-29865</guid>
		<description>Actually James he asked a legitimate hypothetical question without referencing homosexuality in any way, which you chose to dismiss by suggesting his question is flawed. So it&#039;d not you, it&#039;s him? Did you ever think that perhaps you &quot;inferred&quot; incorrectly, applying a subtext to a simple question, that was never intended or implied?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually James he asked a legitimate hypothetical question without referencing homosexuality in any way, which you chose to dismiss by suggesting his question is flawed. So it&#8217;d not you, it&#8217;s him? Did you ever think that perhaps you &#8220;inferred&#8221; incorrectly, applying a subtext to a simple question, that was never intended or implied?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/comment-page-1#comment-29784</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 04:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office#comment-29784</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;James would you disown your child if he divorced his wife and remarried?&lt;/i&gt;

Divorce is not on a one to one parity with homosexual behavior and the inferred premise of your quesion is leading and flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>James would you disown your child if he divorced his wife and remarried?</i></p>
<p>Divorce is not on a one to one parity with homosexual behavior and the inferred premise of your quesion is leading and flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captain_menace</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/comment-page-1#comment-29782</link>
		<dc:creator>captain_menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 04:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office#comment-29782</guid>
		<description>Quite right James.  You&#039;re exactly on point with your reference from the bible.

My favorite scripture from the bible is Leviticus 25:44

&quot;However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you.  You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land.  You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance.  You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way.&quot;

What if Tess had a female slave that she simply sexually abused?  Would that be OK?  Has anyone told her about this option?  I think we may be able to heal this family...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite right James.  You&#8217;re exactly on point with your reference from the bible.</p>
<p>My favorite scripture from the bible is Leviticus 25:44</p>
<p>&#8220;However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you.  You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land.  You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance.  You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way.&#8221;</p>
<p>What if Tess had a female slave that she simply sexually abused?  Would that be OK?  Has anyone told her about this option?  I think we may be able to heal this family&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/comment-page-1#comment-29770</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 02:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office#comment-29770</guid>
		<description>Regarding James Dobson,
He&#039;s a guy I really want to like.  He makes great sense much of the time if one is considering morals, right v wrong, etc.  But politically he&#039;s wrong, and in fact, dangerous in my opinion.  I&#039;m a main stream (now Methodist, formerly Lutheran) Christian.  The evangelical Christians are good folks but they have been co-opted away from the true Christian faith.  Many of their leaders publically proclaim greater allegiance to Israel than the United States!  Something is truly rotten, and it&#039;s not in Denmark! It&#039;s all part of the tremendous tentacles and control the &quot;Lobby&quot; has over us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding James Dobson,<br />
He&#8217;s a guy I really want to like.  He makes great sense much of the time if one is considering morals, right v wrong, etc.  But politically he&#8217;s wrong, and in fact, dangerous in my opinion.  I&#8217;m a main stream (now Methodist, formerly Lutheran) Christian.  The evangelical Christians are good folks but they have been co-opted away from the true Christian faith.  Many of their leaders publically proclaim greater allegiance to Israel than the United States!  Something is truly rotten, and it&#8217;s not in Denmark! It&#8217;s all part of the tremendous tentacles and control the &#8220;Lobby&#8221; has over us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/comment-page-1#comment-29769</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 02:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office#comment-29769</guid>
		<description>James,
I agree with just about everything you have said on this blog at this point.  Most or all families have &quot;issues&quot; and they can be devastating.  Sadie, who I have very mixed feelings about, deserves credit for standing on principle!

James, stick by your principles.  This blog attracts many who have opinions way out of the norm.  But with that said, the populace, in general, has slipped greatly.  And James, I often think you have no clue, but I support you with what you&#039;ve said above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,<br />
I agree with just about everything you have said on this blog at this point.  Most or all families have &#8220;issues&#8221; and they can be devastating.  Sadie, who I have very mixed feelings about, deserves credit for standing on principle!</p>
<p>James, stick by your principles.  This blog attracts many who have opinions way out of the norm.  But with that said, the populace, in general, has slipped greatly.  And James, I often think you have no clue, but I support you with what you&#8217;ve said above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/comment-page-1#comment-29759</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office#comment-29759</guid>
		<description>James would you disown your child if he divorced his wife and remarried?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James would you disown your child if he divorced his wife and remarried?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/comment-page-1#comment-29755</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office#comment-29755</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Since when is loving someone and raising a child together constitute sinful conduct?&lt;/i&gt;

I think you&#039;re intentionally missing the point.

&lt;i&gt;Why do you seem to consider it a virtue if a parent disowns his or her child, and grandchild?&lt;/i&gt;

Why do you think tolerating damning behavior from your offspring is admirable or desirable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Since when is loving someone and raising a child together constitute sinful conduct?</i></p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re intentionally missing the point.</p>
<p><i>Why do you seem to consider it a virtue if a parent disowns his or her child, and grandchild?</i></p>
<p>Why do you think tolerating damning behavior from your offspring is admirable or desirable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Rear</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office/comment-page-1#comment-29749</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Rear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/a-religious-test-for-public-office#comment-29749</guid>
		<description>The Constitution says the eligibility criteria for the Office of President of the United States are (1) born in the US; (2) US citizen; (3) 35 years of age; and (4) no loss of civil rights due to criminal conviction.

Mr Dobson doesn’t seem to think much of the Constitutional requirements, so he adds some of his own: (5) Christian; (6) no, make that EVANGELICAL Christian; and (7) one who talks openly about his (no women?) faith.

--------------------------

James,

Since when is loving someone and raising a child together constitute sinful conduct?

Why do you seem to consider it a virtue if a parent disowns his or her child, and grandchild?

What part of the separation of church and state don’t you understand?

WWJD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Constitution says the eligibility criteria for the Office of President of the United States are (1) born in the US; (2) US citizen; (3) 35 years of age; and (4) no loss of civil rights due to criminal conviction.</p>
<p>Mr Dobson doesn’t seem to think much of the Constitutional requirements, so he adds some of his own: (5) Christian; (6) no, make that EVANGELICAL Christian; and (7) one who talks openly about his (no women?) faith.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>James,</p>
<p>Since when is loving someone and raising a child together constitute sinful conduct?</p>
<p>Why do you seem to consider it a virtue if a parent disowns his or her child, and grandchild?</p>
<p>What part of the separation of church and state don’t you understand?</p>
<p>WWJD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
