<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Pulls Border and Airport Screeners?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners</link>
	<description>Control Congress is a multi-partisan, issue-oriented political forum that brings together the Left, Right, and everyone in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:06:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: abouthadit</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners/comment-page-1#comment-40281</link>
		<dc:creator>abouthadit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 21:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners#comment-40281</guid>
		<description>For any to read this and still believe that GWB is upholding his oath of office to secure our nation, I&#039;ve got some swamp... I mean homes for sale in New Orleans for you.  

And as far as burgeoning enconomy goes: M3, read inflation, is calculated to be running at about 10-12%. All the fiat streaming off the printing presses is going to Goldman Sach, Citi, JP Morgan et al and into the stock market. Asset inflation and the stock market bubble is not  long for this earth. I am out of stocks and long on gold. The only people making money are the ones buying and selling money. This is not wealth creation we are talking about here, it is merely passing the paper around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For any to read this and still believe that GWB is upholding his oath of office to secure our nation, I&#8217;ve got some swamp&#8230; I mean homes for sale in New Orleans for you.  </p>
<p>And as far as burgeoning enconomy goes: M3, read inflation, is calculated to be running at about 10-12%. All the fiat streaming off the printing presses is going to Goldman Sach, Citi, JP Morgan et al and into the stock market. Asset inflation and the stock market bubble is not  long for this earth. I am out of stocks and long on gold. The only people making money are the ones buying and selling money. This is not wealth creation we are talking about here, it is merely passing the paper around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners/comment-page-1#comment-38841</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners#comment-38841</guid>
		<description>Jan Paul
If we ever get our own house in order I think we would see a burgeoning economy which would knock people&#039;s socks off!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan Paul<br />
If we ever get our own house in order I think we would see a burgeoning economy which would knock people&#8217;s socks off!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Paul</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners/comment-page-1#comment-38739</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 03:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners#comment-38739</guid>
		<description>I think I found it. While it is a state administered program, the money is kept by the Feds, and each state has its own account and the surplus in the &quot;trust fund&quot; draws interest which would mean, yes, it is loaned to the general fund. Also when I look in the Treasury Dept. budget I see
quote:
Interest paid to trust fund receipt accounts - shadow account $ 191,752,000,000
======================

Shadow account simply means, its an accounting entry because the money as it came in and the interest is all never seen. It just goes into the general fund and stays in it until some is needed by a state for unemployment payments.   So, in a downturn, we may be in worse shape given what is going on than we currently expect. Hope I am wrong on that one.

If that is the case, look for the Fed to do something to try and hide the problem if possible by getting employment going as quickly as possible.  Usually that is interest rate cuts but that will weaken the dollar even more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I found it. While it is a state administered program, the money is kept by the Feds, and each state has its own account and the surplus in the &#8220;trust fund&#8221; draws interest which would mean, yes, it is loaned to the general fund. Also when I look in the Treasury Dept. budget I see<br />
quote:<br />
Interest paid to trust fund receipt accounts &#8211; shadow account $ 191,752,000,000<br />
======================</p>
<p>Shadow account simply means, its an accounting entry because the money as it came in and the interest is all never seen. It just goes into the general fund and stays in it until some is needed by a state for unemployment payments.   So, in a downturn, we may be in worse shape given what is going on than we currently expect. Hope I am wrong on that one.</p>
<p>If that is the case, look for the Fed to do something to try and hide the problem if possible by getting employment going as quickly as possible.  Usually that is interest rate cuts but that will weaken the dollar even more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Paul</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners/comment-page-1#comment-38736</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 03:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners#comment-38736</guid>
		<description>There is another factor we have to look at.  The government is running on empty.  Toward the end of the article is shows how they are cutting the budget for investigations.

We are cutting programs, department budgets, and other things to keep funding social spending and the war and prescription drugs and Medicaid and education and other things that most of which shouldn&#039;t even be federal programs outside of the Constitutional requirement for defense.  

We have a $59 trillion unfunded liability and are facing 78 million people leaving the ranks of workers and thus the ranks of Payroll Tax payers and becoming collectors of what they paid in, except it isn&#039;t there to collect.  It was loaned out.

Even with the surplus, since it is loaned out, we have to pay in enough taxes to buy the notes in the surplus account and pay the interest due on them each month once inflows are less than outflows and no extra is being paid in to the surplus.

They say the surplus will start being drawn from, not added to by 2017 but, that is with illegal immigrants (soon to be legal if Congress gets its way) paying in the extra that isn&#039;t immediately paid out to current retirees.  My question is, who pays in the surplus during the next downturn. If the jobs dry up and the illegals go home, the unemployment report will look OK but, there will be that many less people paying in.  

Also, in a downturn we can expect some early retirements and thus more people drawing early from social security at 62-66 instead of at full retirement age (what is that now? I know it has been moving up).  We can also expect people drawing unemployment and not paying in but rather drawing from unemployment accounts (are they loaned to the general fund too?)

If we have a serious downturn that lasts a couple of years as &quot;boomers&quot; retire, we could see a dramatic drop in the surplus long before 2017.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is another factor we have to look at.  The government is running on empty.  Toward the end of the article is shows how they are cutting the budget for investigations.</p>
<p>We are cutting programs, department budgets, and other things to keep funding social spending and the war and prescription drugs and Medicaid and education and other things that most of which shouldn&#8217;t even be federal programs outside of the Constitutional requirement for defense.  </p>
<p>We have a $59 trillion unfunded liability and are facing 78 million people leaving the ranks of workers and thus the ranks of Payroll Tax payers and becoming collectors of what they paid in, except it isn&#8217;t there to collect.  It was loaned out.</p>
<p>Even with the surplus, since it is loaned out, we have to pay in enough taxes to buy the notes in the surplus account and pay the interest due on them each month once inflows are less than outflows and no extra is being paid in to the surplus.</p>
<p>They say the surplus will start being drawn from, not added to by 2017 but, that is with illegal immigrants (soon to be legal if Congress gets its way) paying in the extra that isn&#8217;t immediately paid out to current retirees.  My question is, who pays in the surplus during the next downturn. If the jobs dry up and the illegals go home, the unemployment report will look OK but, there will be that many less people paying in.  </p>
<p>Also, in a downturn we can expect some early retirements and thus more people drawing early from social security at 62-66 instead of at full retirement age (what is that now? I know it has been moving up).  We can also expect people drawing unemployment and not paying in but rather drawing from unemployment accounts (are they loaned to the general fund too?)</p>
<p>If we have a serious downturn that lasts a couple of years as &#8220;boomers&#8221; retire, we could see a dramatic drop in the surplus long before 2017.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Paul</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners/comment-page-1#comment-38697</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 01:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners#comment-38697</guid>
		<description>Bill, regarding the evaluations of solving entitlements like Social Security and Medicare with immigration, I would hope you don&#039;t trust them.  They won&#039;t work.

However, Congress doesn&#039;t believe voters will support reform either.  I think they hope we will focus on illegal immigration so much we will overlook the fact that they are raising quotas to astronomical levels.

This is what is really bothering me. Other than Frosty Woodbridge, few are hammering the other &quot;bad news&quot; that even if they were to deport the 20 million here, they would immediately bring them back legally and another 67 to 100 million to boot.

I still think some of this is a delay too.  The longer they delay, the more that come in across our open border.  And, they admit they are raking in billions of payroll taxes they put in &quot;special accounting categories&quot; because the money came from a bad number.  That money, of course, is also immediately loaned out to the general fund which reduces the loans needed from China, Russia and OPEC.

If they stopped all illegal workers from work and paying in (about the amount of surplus paid in each month) they would have to increase borrowing from China, Russia and OPEC and they are already regretting the power they have as bankers.  But, how do you tell the American voter how big a mess our debt has gotten us into?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, regarding the evaluations of solving entitlements like Social Security and Medicare with immigration, I would hope you don&#8217;t trust them.  They won&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>However, Congress doesn&#8217;t believe voters will support reform either.  I think they hope we will focus on illegal immigration so much we will overlook the fact that they are raising quotas to astronomical levels.</p>
<p>This is what is really bothering me. Other than Frosty Woodbridge, few are hammering the other &#8220;bad news&#8221; that even if they were to deport the 20 million here, they would immediately bring them back legally and another 67 to 100 million to boot.</p>
<p>I still think some of this is a delay too.  The longer they delay, the more that come in across our open border.  And, they admit they are raking in billions of payroll taxes they put in &#8220;special accounting categories&#8221; because the money came from a bad number.  That money, of course, is also immediately loaned out to the general fund which reduces the loans needed from China, Russia and OPEC.</p>
<p>If they stopped all illegal workers from work and paying in (about the amount of surplus paid in each month) they would have to increase borrowing from China, Russia and OPEC and they are already regretting the power they have as bankers.  But, how do you tell the American voter how big a mess our debt has gotten us into?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners/comment-page-1#comment-38696</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 01:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners#comment-38696</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s make some sausage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s make some sausage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Paul</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners/comment-page-1#comment-38688</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners#comment-38688</guid>
		<description>Heck we have bigger &quot;porkers&quot; than that in the &quot;jungle&quot; called Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck we have bigger &#8220;porkers&#8221; than that in the &#8220;jungle&#8221; called Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners/comment-page-1#comment-38686</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners#comment-38686</guid>
		<description>More proof that the neocons aren&#039;t serious about the border, national security, or anything national for that matter.  I simply don&#039;t trust these evaluations that we can&#039;t solve any problem without some influx from outsiders.  Instead of pulling these folks from their duties why not kill some of the pork which is meandering through our economy and use the savings?  We&#039;ve got some behemoths ready for the kill.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8PBKB5G0&amp;show_article=1&amp;image=large</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More proof that the neocons aren&#8217;t serious about the border, national security, or anything national for that matter.  I simply don&#8217;t trust these evaluations that we can&#8217;t solve any problem without some influx from outsiders.  Instead of pulling these folks from their duties why not kill some of the pork which is meandering through our economy and use the savings?  We&#8217;ve got some behemoths ready for the kill.<br />
<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8PBKB5G0&amp;show_article=1&amp;image=large" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8PBKB5G0&amp;show_article=1&amp;image=large</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Paul</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners/comment-page-1#comment-38627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/bush-pulls-border-and-airport-screeners#comment-38627</guid>
		<description>NO it isn&#039;t a good idea but, this nation isn&#039;t serious about the border. The North American Union (they call it a community) is moving ahead.

Texans are saying they have been defeated in their effort to stop the TTC construction and that Gov. Perry has the upper hand again.   The movement of &quot;people&quot; as well as goods to the U.S. is a high priority.

Why not secure the border?

The immigrations quotas until this new immigration bill or bills are passed is way lower than what Congress believes is needed to keep workers to retirees at 3 to 1 or more.  So, if you can&#039;t bring them here legally until those quotas are raised, you bring them here illegally and then grant some type of amnesty or &quot;guest worker&quot; that leads to as much as amnesty.

Good luck America.  You are going to need luck because &quot;skill&quot; in Washington is killing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO it isn&#8217;t a good idea but, this nation isn&#8217;t serious about the border. The North American Union (they call it a community) is moving ahead.</p>
<p>Texans are saying they have been defeated in their effort to stop the TTC construction and that Gov. Perry has the upper hand again.   The movement of &#8220;people&#8221; as well as goods to the U.S. is a high priority.</p>
<p>Why not secure the border?</p>
<p>The immigrations quotas until this new immigration bill or bills are passed is way lower than what Congress believes is needed to keep workers to retirees at 3 to 1 or more.  So, if you can&#8217;t bring them here legally until those quotas are raised, you bring them here illegally and then grant some type of amnesty or &#8220;guest worker&#8221; that leads to as much as amnesty.</p>
<p>Good luck America.  You are going to need luck because &#8220;skill&#8221; in Washington is killing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
