<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Estimates of Iraq War Cost Were Not Close to Ballpark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark</link>
	<description>Control Congress is a multi-partisan, issue-oriented political forum that brings together the Left, Right, and everyone in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:25:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JohnKonop</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/comment-page-1#comment-69146</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKonop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark#comment-69146</guid>
		<description>Bart

That is the same math that got us 8 trillion in the red and growing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bart</p>
<p>That is the same math that got us 8 trillion in the red and growing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/comment-page-1#comment-69144</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark#comment-69144</guid>
		<description>bb you&#039;re high my friend.  Must be the good stuff your smoking.

Initial estimates for Iraq occupation = $60 billion.

Cost to date (limited to only approved budget, no externalities) = $600 billion.

That&#039;s ten times the original estimate.  That&#039;s 1000%.

If you need math tutoring I&#039;m happy to help.  I understand that bible study doesn&#039;t always allow for basic life skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bb you&#8217;re high my friend.  Must be the good stuff your smoking.</p>
<p>Initial estimates for Iraq occupation = $60 billion.</p>
<p>Cost to date (limited to only approved budget, no externalities) = $600 billion.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s ten times the original estimate.  That&#8217;s 1000%.</p>
<p>If you need math tutoring I&#8217;m happy to help.  I understand that bible study doesn&#8217;t always allow for basic life skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnKonop</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/comment-page-1#comment-69107</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKonop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark#comment-69107</guid>
		<description>Captain

What about the cheap gas prices?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captain</p>
<p>What about the cheap gas prices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/comment-page-1#comment-69102</link>
		<dc:creator>bb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark#comment-69102</guid>
		<description>What 1000% overrun?

Initial est.: $6b - $9B per month

Actual cost to date: $563B after 5 years = less than $10B per month

No terrorist attacks on America or its ships, embassies since.

I would say Bush and company did exactly what they said, accomplished exactly what was needed and setup future administrations with an opportunity to find peace in the mid east....win, win, win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What 1000% overrun?</p>
<p>Initial est.: $6b &#8211; $9B per month</p>
<p>Actual cost to date: $563B after 5 years = less than $10B per month</p>
<p>No terrorist attacks on America or its ships, embassies since.</p>
<p>I would say Bush and company did exactly what they said, accomplished exactly what was needed and setup future administrations with an opportunity to find peace in the mid east&#8230;.win, win, win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captain_menace</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/comment-page-1#comment-69066</link>
		<dc:creator>captain_menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 04:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark#comment-69066</guid>
		<description>bb, your finger pointing on this thread says it all.

1000% overrun on a government project is pretty substantial.  The Iraq War isn&#039;t a program, it&#039;s a project.  A project that will fail (sorry to be such a Debby Downer).

Panama Canal - 106% cost overrun
Hoover Dam - 12% cost overrun
Erie Canal - 46% cost overrun

These were all government projects that had a clear beginning and a clear end.  Our mission in Iraq was presented (sold) similarly, with a beginning and an end, and a price tag of $60 billion.

Only in Conservativeville is someone promoted and praised for such ineptitude.  Congratulations.

Suck it up and admit that your buddy Bush blew it.  The guy is a complete idiot.

Can I have my portion of the war cost back please?  Oh yeah, that&#039;s right, we haven&#039;t even started paying on it yet.  Duh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bb, your finger pointing on this thread says it all.</p>
<p>1000% overrun on a government project is pretty substantial.  The Iraq War isn&#8217;t a program, it&#8217;s a project.  A project that will fail (sorry to be such a Debby Downer).</p>
<p>Panama Canal &#8211; 106% cost overrun<br />
Hoover Dam &#8211; 12% cost overrun<br />
Erie Canal &#8211; 46% cost overrun</p>
<p>These were all government projects that had a clear beginning and a clear end.  Our mission in Iraq was presented (sold) similarly, with a beginning and an end, and a price tag of $60 billion.</p>
<p>Only in Conservativeville is someone promoted and praised for such ineptitude.  Congratulations.</p>
<p>Suck it up and admit that your buddy Bush blew it.  The guy is a complete idiot.</p>
<p>Can I have my portion of the war cost back please?  Oh yeah, that&#8217;s right, we haven&#8217;t even started paying on it yet.  Duh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/comment-page-1#comment-69063</link>
		<dc:creator>bb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark#comment-69063</guid>
		<description>Dems pay...LOL!  Where do dems get their money...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dems pay&#8230;LOL!  Where do dems get their money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Rear</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/comment-page-1#comment-69058</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Rear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark#comment-69058</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;How do we pay for this?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

Pay?  

GOPers don’t &lt;i&gt;pay,&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt; Democrats &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;  pay!



&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><i>How do we pay for this?</i></b></p>
<p>Pay?  </p>
<p>GOPers don’t <i>pay,</i> <b><i> Democrats </i></b>  pay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnKonop</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/comment-page-1#comment-69046</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKonop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark#comment-69046</guid>
		<description>Bart

9 trillion in the red and growing is your side!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bart</p>
<p>9 trillion in the red and growing is your side!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/comment-page-1#comment-69042</link>
		<dc:creator>bb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark#comment-69042</guid>
		<description>John,

You have got to stop relying upon polls to justify your liberal opinions.  Do you really believe 71% have even the slightest grasp of how the government spends our money?

Given that the MSM hits Americans daily with cost of war but never mentions anything else, I&#039;m surprised the percentage wasn&#039;t much higher.

This horse is beaten to death.  I stand by my position in favor of the war and need to end entitlements.  You obviously side with B. Hussein Obama and other ultra libs.  

The Constitution is on my side, marxist DNC platform on yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>You have got to stop relying upon polls to justify your liberal opinions.  Do you really believe 71% have even the slightest grasp of how the government spends our money?</p>
<p>Given that the MSM hits Americans daily with cost of war but never mentions anything else, I&#8217;m surprised the percentage wasn&#8217;t much higher.</p>
<p>This horse is beaten to death.  I stand by my position in favor of the war and need to end entitlements.  You obviously side with B. Hussein Obama and other ultra libs.  </p>
<p>The Constitution is on my side, marxist DNC platform on yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnKonop</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark/comment-page-1#comment-69039</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKonop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/estimates-of-iraq-war-cost-were-not-close-to-ballpark#comment-69039</guid>
		<description>Poll: 71 percent think Iraq spending hurts economy

(CNN) — More than 7 out of 10 Americans think government spending on the war in Iraq is partly responsible for the economic troubles in the United States, according to results of a recent poll.

In the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll conducted last weekend, 71 percent said they think U.S. spending in Iraq is a reason for the nation&#039;s poor economy. Twenty-eight percent said they didn&#039;t think so.

The weekend poll, timed to coincide with the Iraq war&#039;s fifth anniversary, also showed little U.S. support for the conflict. Fewer than one in three respondents — 32 percent — said they support the war, while 66 percent said they oppose it.

Full story

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/19/poll-71-percent-think-iraq-spending-hurts-economy/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poll: 71 percent think Iraq spending hurts economy</p>
<p>(CNN) — More than 7 out of 10 Americans think government spending on the war in Iraq is partly responsible for the economic troubles in the United States, according to results of a recent poll.</p>
<p>In the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll conducted last weekend, 71 percent said they think U.S. spending in Iraq is a reason for the nation&#8217;s poor economy. Twenty-eight percent said they didn&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>The weekend poll, timed to coincide with the Iraq war&#8217;s fifth anniversary, also showed little U.S. support for the conflict. Fewer than one in three respondents — 32 percent — said they support the war, while 66 percent said they oppose it.</p>
<p>Full story</p>
<p><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/19/poll-71-percent-think-iraq-spending-hurts-economy/" rel="nofollow">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/19/poll-71-percent-think-iraq-spending-hurts-economy/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
