<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Uncensored Parts 1 and 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2</link>
	<description>Control Congress is a multi-partisan, issue-oriented political forum that brings together the Left, Right, and everyone in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:25:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/comment-page-1#comment-53869</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2#comment-53869</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hillary wants to expand government indoctrination centers aka public schools.&quot;

lol. They&#039;s indoctrinating me with maths!

Yeah, this is a real dealbreaker for Hillary--a ten minute video with accusations from convicted felon. Yawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hillary wants to expand government indoctrination centers aka public schools.&#8221;</p>
<p>lol. They&#8217;s indoctrinating me with maths!</p>
<p>Yeah, this is a real dealbreaker for Hillary&#8211;a ten minute video with accusations from convicted felon. Yawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/comment-page-1#comment-53602</link>
		<dc:creator>bb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2#comment-53602</guid>
		<description>John,

Hillary wants national government provided healthcare.  Konop agrees.

Hillary wants to surrender in Iraq.  Konop agrees.

Hillary wants to raise taxes on the &quot;wealthy&quot;.  Konop agrees.

Hillary wants to expand government indoctrination centers aka public schools.  Konop agrees.

John, which candidate will you finally support...Hillary, Dennis or John Edwards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Hillary wants national government provided healthcare.  Konop agrees.</p>
<p>Hillary wants to surrender in Iraq.  Konop agrees.</p>
<p>Hillary wants to raise taxes on the &#8220;wealthy&#8221;.  Konop agrees.</p>
<p>Hillary wants to expand government indoctrination centers aka public schools.  Konop agrees.</p>
<p>John, which candidate will you finally support&#8230;Hillary, Dennis or John Edwards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Paul</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/comment-page-1#comment-53533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2#comment-53533</guid>
		<description>David, we know it is true because it is verified from other sources either near the same time, or after the fact when people start digging based on a search to prove the report true or not.

It doesn&#039;t matter where the information came from. It has to be verified whether it comes from a &quot;conspiracy site,&quot; or the major media, or even the government.

Only verification will tell us whether we are being fed lies or not and all news needs verification.   You certainly wouldn&#039;t trust CBS or the Press Corp or the President or a Congressman until the information is verified but often there is &quot;truth&quot; in what they say.  It may not be the whole truth any more than what any other biased site puts out, but usually, there is some truth behind what they say.  Search for the bits that are truth and discard the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, we know it is true because it is verified from other sources either near the same time, or after the fact when people start digging based on a search to prove the report true or not.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter where the information came from. It has to be verified whether it comes from a &#8220;conspiracy site,&#8221; or the major media, or even the government.</p>
<p>Only verification will tell us whether we are being fed lies or not and all news needs verification.   You certainly wouldn&#8217;t trust CBS or the Press Corp or the President or a Congressman until the information is verified but often there is &#8220;truth&#8221; in what they say.  It may not be the whole truth any more than what any other biased site puts out, but usually, there is some truth behind what they say.  Search for the bits that are truth and discard the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnKonop</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/comment-page-1#comment-53529</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKonop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2#comment-53529</guid>
		<description>Bart,

You are the one who agrees with Hillary on policy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bart,</p>
<p>You are the one who agrees with Hillary on policy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Rear</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/comment-page-1#comment-53528</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Rear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2#comment-53528</guid>
		<description>critical</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>critical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Rear</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/comment-page-1#comment-53527</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Rear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2#comment-53527</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Jan Paul,&lt;/b&gt;

Think about what you&#039;re saying:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;What do you care where the information came from?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Credible sources are absolutely critica.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;We know it is true.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

How?

&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Jan Paul,</b></p>
<p>Think about what you&#8217;re saying:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;What do you care where the information came from?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Credible sources are absolutely critica.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;We know it is true.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>How?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Paul</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/comment-page-1#comment-53519</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2#comment-53519</guid>
		<description>Caroline, the contributions were illegal from China. That is the fact, not that they were from China or any other nation.  But, the Chinese are in love with Bill (and as a result, with Hillary since they probably think she will be a clone of Bill on foreign policy).

You asked
quote:
Don’t you think there are criticisms that don’t come from conspiracy sites?
====================
By all means.  Several sites that aren&#039;t conspiracy sites criticize the Clinton&#039;s all the time.  The other democratic candidates criticize the Clintons, the liberal organizations criticize the Clintons as do members of Congress, the press, mainstream media.   Who cares where the criticism comes from as long as it is accurate.

If Russia says &quot;such and such&quot; about the U.S., I know they are biased but, if it is the truth, I still pay attention.  I may seek further support but, often the truth first comes from biased sources and then, when people investigate to find the &quot;full truth&quot; they find that even though coming from a biased source originally, it was true.

Let me ask you. Do you think there are never conspiracies?  If you think that, then you are denying the very history of our founding and 235 years of existence.  Conspiracies are how politics work at times.   Nixon was pretty good at them.  Reagan was, Clinton was, and Bush is.  That is normal life in politics. 

Take what David Rockefeller said
quote:
&quot;We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.&quot;

David Rockefeller Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
=======================
Doing many things in secret, i.e. a conspiracy, to accomplish steps to a goal, an adversary may not you to reach is how Washington operates.

Look how many &quot;conspiracies&quot; have been uncovered by the &quot;Freedom of Information Act.&quot;   

A conspiracy site often is the very place to find people who use the &quot;Freedom of Information Act,&quot; to uncover what is going on or has gone on in both parties.

I am sure you will agree both parties are just as inclined as the other (just different agendas) to use &quot;conspiracy&quot; as a means to get what they want.

Yes, you have to take each thing a biased source says as suspect but, that doesn&#039;t mean they aren&#039;t very useful.  Use the Liberal sites for the GOP and the &quot;right wingers,&quot; for what the Democrats are up to.  Since neither party is worth a hoot, use both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caroline, the contributions were illegal from China. That is the fact, not that they were from China or any other nation.  But, the Chinese are in love with Bill (and as a result, with Hillary since they probably think she will be a clone of Bill on foreign policy).</p>
<p>You asked<br />
quote:<br />
Don’t you think there are criticisms that don’t come from conspiracy sites?<br />
====================<br />
By all means.  Several sites that aren&#8217;t conspiracy sites criticize the Clinton&#8217;s all the time.  The other democratic candidates criticize the Clintons, the liberal organizations criticize the Clintons as do members of Congress, the press, mainstream media.   Who cares where the criticism comes from as long as it is accurate.</p>
<p>If Russia says &#8220;such and such&#8221; about the U.S., I know they are biased but, if it is the truth, I still pay attention.  I may seek further support but, often the truth first comes from biased sources and then, when people investigate to find the &#8220;full truth&#8221; they find that even though coming from a biased source originally, it was true.</p>
<p>Let me ask you. Do you think there are never conspiracies?  If you think that, then you are denying the very history of our founding and 235 years of existence.  Conspiracies are how politics work at times.   Nixon was pretty good at them.  Reagan was, Clinton was, and Bush is.  That is normal life in politics. </p>
<p>Take what David Rockefeller said<br />
quote:<br />
&#8220;We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.&#8221;</p>
<p>David Rockefeller Baden-Baden, Germany 1991<br />
=======================<br />
Doing many things in secret, i.e. a conspiracy, to accomplish steps to a goal, an adversary may not you to reach is how Washington operates.</p>
<p>Look how many &#8220;conspiracies&#8221; have been uncovered by the &#8220;Freedom of Information Act.&#8221;   </p>
<p>A conspiracy site often is the very place to find people who use the &#8220;Freedom of Information Act,&#8221; to uncover what is going on or has gone on in both parties.</p>
<p>I am sure you will agree both parties are just as inclined as the other (just different agendas) to use &#8220;conspiracy&#8221; as a means to get what they want.</p>
<p>Yes, you have to take each thing a biased source says as suspect but, that doesn&#8217;t mean they aren&#8217;t very useful.  Use the Liberal sites for the GOP and the &#8220;right wingers,&#8221; for what the Democrats are up to.  Since neither party is worth a hoot, use both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caroline</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/comment-page-1#comment-53511</link>
		<dc:creator>caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2#comment-53511</guid>
		<description>bb,
Wow, what an original fundamentalist neocon post. It could have been written fifty years ago. It&#039;s the 21st century whether you like it or not. Besides, you don&#039;t seem to have a problem with China. You seem very supportive of their business interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bb,<br />
Wow, what an original fundamentalist neocon post. It could have been written fifty years ago. It&#8217;s the 21st century whether you like it or not. Besides, you don&#8217;t seem to have a problem with China. You seem very supportive of their business interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/comment-page-1#comment-53509</link>
		<dc:creator>bb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2#comment-53509</guid>
		<description>caroline,

When they write my thank you note, will it be funded by illegal chinese money, or even worse, from Hollywood??!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>caroline,</p>
<p>When they write my thank you note, will it be funded by illegal chinese money, or even worse, from Hollywood??!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caroline</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2/comment-page-1#comment-53502</link>
		<dc:creator>caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hillary-uncensored-part-1-and-2#comment-53502</guid>
		<description>Jan Paul,
Don&#039;t you think there are criticisms that don&#039;t come from conspiracy sites?

bb,
Still stuck in past eh? I&#039;m sure that the Clintons will thank you for all your help. Whackos like you have done nothing but help them. Perhaps she and Bill will write you a thank you note.

PS. Are you one of those people that were know as the &quot;Clinton Crazies&quot;? Sounds like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan Paul,<br />
Don&#8217;t you think there are criticisms that don&#8217;t come from conspiracy sites?</p>
<p>bb,<br />
Still stuck in past eh? I&#8217;m sure that the Clintons will thank you for all your help. Whackos like you have done nothing but help them. Perhaps she and Bill will write you a thank you note.</p>
<p>PS. Are you one of those people that were know as the &#8220;Clinton Crazies&#8221;? Sounds like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
