-
Your ad here.
Control Congress is a multi-partisan, issue-oriented political forum that brings together the Left, Right, and everyone in between.
17 Responses to “Martin Luther King, Jr.: I Have a Dream”
|
Your ad here.
|
Here’s who I revere:(hint, it’s not King)
http://tinyurl.com/2sagxr
And for those who haven’t taken the logs from their eyes yet, here is a listing of articles from Vdare, that relate to Martin Luther King. I challenge you to read some of these as you won’t find this information in the MSM – your mandated GATEKEEPER!
http://tinyurl.com/2vvcsb
The Confederate leaders and MLK, Jr. should be honored…it doesn’t have to be one or the other Hugh.
bb,
Appears you haven’t read a sampling of the links I provided in my post #2 master link! I don’t think you would make the statement you did in your post #3 had you looked at some of the facts surrounding Martin Luther King. He is not someone to be revered!
I am very aware of MLK and his life both good and bad.
What he did relative to civil rights cannot be denied. Were it not for him, it is quite possible if not likely that this country would have entered into a race war with heavy casualties. Do you think that would have been the better course Hugh?
Your prejudice against black folks is well known…no need to rehash that. MLK earned any revenrence directed his way as the de facto leader of the civil rights movement.
If one is to be judged on singular events instead of the full body of one’s work, then there will be a very few deserving of respect.
bb,
Re your post #5:
I don’t have a prejudice against black folks, it would be better stated that I naturally cleave to my own kind! There is a difference, and it happens to be quite normal. It’s only due to the overwhelming pressure from the forces of Political Correctness that Caucasians have begun to feel guilty or something, about themselves.
And I don’t think it has to be one way or the other re your point that we would have entered into a “race war with heavy casualties” without Martin Luther King.
Again, if you had looked at some of the links that I led to re my posting #2, you would have seen that the multiculturalists are playing off King to work toward their objectives. And that race war you mentioned still might be forthcoming. Have you taken the pulse of the Caucasian Americans today? They have about had a belly full of all this multiculturalism! Have you ever looked at the crime statistics? They are essentially one sided – they attack us, we don’t attack them. And I’m talking rape, murder, etc. It’s suicidal for the Western world!
bb,
Here’s one more link for you. This article, by Alan Stang, is in depth on Martin Luther King. Is this King worth his position in our society in your opinion? Read the attached article and then tell me, please.
http://tinyurl.com/36sy85
Hugh,
What, you couldn’t find a rant written by David Dukes to link?
So from your #8; crime is caused by minorities and white folks are tired of being victims of minority attacks…”they attack us, we don’t attack them”…Wow! And the Western world is committing suicide by allowing crime ridden minorities to be part of white society…again, just Wow!
No prejudice????
bb,
Just stating facts, pure facts. Not proposing solutions, but I’m real tired of sweeping EVERYTHING under the rug. So again, the crime statistics are what they are!! And yes, the Western World IS committing suicide. Lots brighter and more learned folks than me feel the same way. Buchanan, in his “Day of Reckoning” gets into some of this. But he’s only one.
bb, did you read the article I posted in #7?
http://tinyurl.com/36sy85
And can you refute the multiple factual points made?
Hugh,
I started reading it, then realized how devoid of referenced facts the story was, so I checked out the author’s bio…just another paranoid conspiracy kook with a computer.
Why do so many paranoid, xenophobic, conspriacy kook racists support Ron Paul?
bb, I’m making it easy on myself and copying what I left on another thread on this blog. I really would appreciate you giving reasoned arguments re this article rather than just throwing around Politically Correct Labels! That approach exposes you bankruptcy of ideas…it really gets you nowhere except to score points with your handlers! Here’s my pasted comment:
“Hey all, here’s what bb doesn’t want you to read. Guess bb’s part of the greater MSM GATEKEEPING Society. He wants to decide what you read. Me, I prefer to go to sources and “non-MSM approved articles, and then make up my own mind.
Here’s what bb doesn’t want you to read about “Mike”:
http://tinyurl.com/36sy85“
“pure facts…the crime statistics are what they are” — not so fast Hugh.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/tables/racetab.htm
Link to Justice Dept. stats on violent crimes by race. You will see that 6.5 whites per 1000 are victimized while the number is 13.6 of 1000 blacks.
Most violent crime is black on black, white on white, brown on brown. Hugh, your version of the ‘truth’ does not stand the scrutiny of factual data.
From the report —
In 2005–
Per every 1,000 persons in that racial group, 27 blacks, 20 whites and 14 persons of other races sustained a violent crime.
Black and white persons experienced similar rates of simple assault.
Black, white, and other races experienced about the same rates of rape/sexual assault.
According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports, in 2005 about 49% of murder victims were white, 49% were black, and 3% were Asians, Pacific Islander, and Native Americans.
Blacks were more likely than whites to be victimized by a carjacking (3 versus 1 per 10,000 respectively) 1993-2002.
Between 2001 and 2005, American Indians experienced violence at rates more than twice that of blacks, 2 1/2 times that of whites, and more than 5 times that of Asians (maybe it’s the Indians you should be concerned with Hugh).
In 2005 —
Property crimes were experienced by 145 of 1,000 black households and 156 of 1,000 white households.
Burglaries were experienced by 35 of 1,000 black households and 29 of 1,000 white households.
For motor vehicle theft, the rates were 13 per 1,000 black households and 8 per 1,000 white households.
Hugh,
Just like my support of Ron Paul to be included in every debate, I encourage anybody that desires to read the rants of a paranoid conspiracy kook to follow your link.
Not so fast, bb. The FBI, “conveniently” lumps Hispanics with whites in certain cases to make the whites look bad and to underplay Hispanic crime. Also, we still have a few whites left in this nation, so percentage relationships are very important. I’m attaching two links of statistical analysis by honest folks. I stand by my comments!
“Hispanic Statistics, A statistical portrait”
http://tinyurl.com/3dt4zg
“The Color of Crime”
http://tinyurl.com/38vrht
bb,
You favor honoring people to took up arms against their own nation?
Just checking the facts.
DOR,
What are you asking?
bb,
If you aren’t interested in just dry statistics, here’s a little video that might wake you up. It puts faces and details with some names. You can ignore this if you wish, but I always go where the truth leads me!
http://tinyurl.com/2r3e5x