Control Congress is a multi-partisan, issue-oriented political forum that brings together the Left, Right, and everyone in between.

Petraeus Hearings — More Obama than McCain?

.Does this hurt McCain?

HP- Afghan/Pakistan border region, not Iraq, is the greatest threat: General Petraeus agrees with Admiral Mullen and with our intelligence commnity that the next likely terrorist attack on the U.S. homeland will come from Pakistan and the Federally Administred Tribal Areas. So just to sum up. Our intelligence Community, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and future CENTCOM commander all agree that Pakistan is the greatest danger, but conservatives continue to insist that Iraq is the central front.

2. Petraeus agrees with Gates, not Bush and McCain, on talking to Iran: In his written responses General Petraeus agreed with Secretary Gates that we need a comprehensive approach to Iran that includes real diplomacy and engages on all issues.

3. Odierno acknowledges that there is no need for a permanent presence in Iraq: Despite John McCain’s claims that we can have an indefinite Korea-like presence in Iraq, when asked by Jim Webb about the need for a permanent presence Odierno stated that it would be unnecessary.

4. McCain missing in action: As the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee, you’d think John McCain would show up. But instead he is in California campaigning and fundraising. When Petraeus was last confirmed for Iraq Commander, McCain was off in Davos Switzerland.

read more

Posted by JohnKonop on Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 at 1:43 pm | under Uncategorized | |RSS 2.0 feed | Comments and pings closed. |

4 Responses to “Petraeus Hearings — More Obama than McCain?”

  1. Bill Says:
    May 22nd, 2008 at 8:52 pm

    Nothing really changes any more, other than we’re loosing our freedom and our money. This is what happens when the corporations take over. Representative government my ass.

  2. religiouslib Says:
    May 22nd, 2008 at 10:02 pm

    i don’t always agree with you john but you are one of the most rational clear-headed posters on townhall.

    you do your homework and present facts.

    you have my respect

  3. JohnKonop Says:
    May 23rd, 2008 at 4:55 am

    religiouslib

    Thank You!

  4. JohnKonop Says:
    May 23rd, 2008 at 5:14 am

    General Petraeus Confirmation Hearings Begin

    Gen. David Petraeus said Thursday he is likely to recommend further troop reductions in Iraq but won’t promise more details until fall _ timing that plunges the four-star Army general into the heart of this year’s presidential elections.

    The fall assessment would come at a critical time in both American and Iraqi politics. U.S. voters likely will be deciding between a GOP candidate committed to keeping troops in Iraq as long as Petraeus and other ground commanders say is necessary, and a Democratic challenger who supports the immediate withdrawal of forces.

    At the same time, Iraq will be headed into its much-anticipated provincial elections, which U.S. officials have described as a crucial step in building national reconciliation by increasing participation by the Sunni minority.

    Petraeus said conditions on the ground will still dictate his decision. But by September, when he is slated to assume control of U.S. Central Command, “my sense is that I will be able to make a recommendation at that time for some further reductions,” he said.

    Petraeus cautioned that he was not implying that that means a particular brigade or major combat formation. “But I do believe there will be certain assets that, as we are already looking at the picture right now, we’ll be able to recommend can be either redeployed or not deployed to the theater in the fall,” he said.

    In a speech at Fort Bragg, N.C., President Bush said progress in Iraq was undeniable and that “we are on our way to victory.” He also said he looked forward to hearing what his generals would recommend, and he didn’t tip his hand as to what he wants to hear.

    “My message to our commanders is you will have all the troops, you will have all the resources you need to win in Iraq,” Bush said at the Army base, where he was speaking to 17,000 paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division.

    In recent months, Petraeus has helped to tame growing opposition to the war in Congress by providing measured assessments of progress and warning that an exodus of U.S. troops would result in chaos.

    His unflappable style was on display again Thursday in a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing to confirm him for the Central Command post. The hearing was considerably less contentious than his past appearances on Capitol Hill and even came with an endorsement by the panel’s chairman, Sen. Carl Levin, and Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton.

    Also receiving a warm reception was Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, expected to replace Petraeus as the top commander in Iraq. Odierno previously served 15 months in Iraq as Petraeus’ deputy.

    “Regardless how long the administration may choose to remain engaged in the strife in that country, our troops are better off with the leadership these two distinguished soldiers provide,” said Levin, D-Mich.

    Clinton, D-N.Y., thanked the generals for their “incredible leadership.”

    Petraeus has previously been reluctant to say when his next assessment of troop levels might be. This spring he recommended _ and Bush agreed _ to withdraw by July the 30,000 extra troops sent to Iraq last year as part of a major security push to blunt increasing sectarian violence.

    In testimony last month, Petraeus said he needed a 45-day period of evaluation and then an indefinite period of assessment before he would recommend any further pullouts, holding his ground against Democrats demanding to know whether more withdrawals were possible before Bush leaves office in January.

    Levin said Petraeus’ more recent pledge to review troop levels by September was “good news to most of us.”

    On a less-optimistic note, Petraeus said it is unlikely that Iraqi security forces will take the lead in all provinces this year, as was recently predicted by the Defense Department. Petraeus said events in the past month and a half _ an allusion to the spike in violence in Basra _ have pushed that goal to 2009.

    Provincial elections also are likely to be delayed by one month this fall, taking place in November instead of October, he said.

    Odierno told the committee he did not anticipate a need to boost troop levels, even temporarily, in advance of the elections.

    “I will never say never, but my assessment now is, with the progress we’re making, the progress we’re seeing in the Iraqi security forces, and what I’m seeing is the security environment on the ground, currently I do not believe we will need an increase,” Odierno said.

    Petraeus would replace Navy Adm. William Fallon as the senior commander of troops in the Middle East, which includes such troubled hotspots as Iran, Pakistan, Lebanon, parts of Africa and Afghanistan.

    If confirmed, he said, one of his first trips would be to Pakistan, where U.S. officials say al-Qaida fighters are regrouping along the Afghan border.

    “I think that the key need is to assess whether the overall concept that is guiding (operations) on the Pakistani side in particular, or course, is adequate or not,” Petraeus said.

    Clinton said she was concerned that not enough attention was being paid to the terrorist threat there, Afghanistan and elsewhere in the world, including Africa.

    “It has been the forgotten front lines in the war against terrorism. And we have allowed what was an initial success to, if not deteriorate, certainly stagnate,” she said.