<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ralph Nader launches exploratory website</title>
	<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website</link>
	<description>Control Congress is a multi-partisan, issue-oriented political forum that brings together the Left, Right, and everyone in between.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Site Admin</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63120</link>
		<dc:creator>Site Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63120</guid>
		<description>I just disabled a program that helps us block comment spam (from porn sites and what not).

Hopefully it will help. Thanks (as always) for your patience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just disabled a program that helps us block comment spam (from porn sites and what not).</p>
<p>Hopefully it will help. Thanks (as always) for your patience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63115</link>
		<dc:creator>bb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63115</guid>
		<description>Answer to #4 -- nobody unless he combines with McKinney and Bloomberg to take from the dems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answer to #4 &#8212; nobody unless he combines with McKinney and Bloomberg to take from the dems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Paul</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63090</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63090</guid>
		<description>Who would a Nader run hurt most?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would a Nader run hurt most?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63084</link>
		<dc:creator>bb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63084</guid>
		<description>Chris,

I would agree, but you may not know due to the post being held 'awaiting moderation' :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I would agree, but you may not know due to the post being held &#8216;awaiting moderation&#8217; <img src='http://controlcongress.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63078</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63078</guid>
		<description>I encourage everyone to boycott this blog until the admins correct the filter problem that blocks every other post I write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encourage everyone to boycott this blog until the admins correct the filter problem that blocks every other post I write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnKonop</title>
		<link>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63074</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKonop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/ralph-nader-launches-exploratory-website#comment-63074</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ralph Nader on Immigration &lt;/strong&gt;

Q. What is your stance on numeric caps for legal immigration and/or quotas for specific countries for immigration, and whether there should be amnesties for illegal immigrants? 
A. The first stage for our immigration policy is stop supporting oligarchs, dictatorships, authoritarian regimes that drive people to leave their native lands out of economic desperation or political repression. Lots of people from Mexico and Central America would now be in those countries, not in this country, if they had a decent chance in a democratic society to have an adequate standard of living. We cannot have open borders. That’s a totally absurd proposition. It would depress wages here enormously, and tens of millions of people from all levels, including scientists and workers, would be pouring into this country. One way is to provide work permits for people who come in and do work for short periods of time that Americans don’t want to do instead of criminalizing the border. 

Source: John Ellis, The Fresno (CA) Bee Oct 22, 2000 

Guest workers OK, with labor standards 
Q. Do you support a guest worker program? 
A. Yes, under work permits, so everything is above board. So they are not exploited. Right now, employers have the best of both worlds. They exploit workers, they make huge profits, and they escape prosecution. Farm labor, whether American or unlawful immigrants, don’t have the protection under labor laws that industrial workers have. The idea is to bring all farm labor under the Fair Labor Standards Act. 

Source: John Ellis, The Fresno (CA) Bee Oct 22, 2000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ralph Nader on Immigration </strong></p>
<p>Q. What is your stance on numeric caps for legal immigration and/or quotas for specific countries for immigration, and whether there should be amnesties for illegal immigrants?<br />
A. The first stage for our immigration policy is stop supporting oligarchs, dictatorships, authoritarian regimes that drive people to leave their native lands out of economic desperation or political repression. Lots of people from Mexico and Central America would now be in those countries, not in this country, if they had a decent chance in a democratic society to have an adequate standard of living. We cannot have open borders. That’s a totally absurd proposition. It would depress wages here enormously, and tens of millions of people from all levels, including scientists and workers, would be pouring into this country. One way is to provide work permits for people who come in and do work for short periods of time that Americans don’t want to do instead of criminalizing the border. </p>
<p>Source: John Ellis, The Fresno (CA) Bee Oct 22, 2000 </p>
<p>Guest workers OK, with labor standards<br />
Q. Do you support a guest worker program?<br />
A. Yes, under work permits, so everything is above board. So they are not exploited. Right now, employers have the best of both worlds. They exploit workers, they make huge profits, and they escape prosecution. Farm labor, whether American or unlawful immigrants, don’t have the protection under labor laws that industrial workers have. The idea is to bring all farm labor under the Fair Labor Standards Act. </p>
<p>Source: John Ellis, The Fresno (CA) Bee Oct 22, 2000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
