Comments on: Romney Faith Speech?

By: David O'Rear

David O'Rear — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:31:51 +0000

Cheney/Satan ‘08 !

By: bb

bb — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:14:15 +0000

caroline,

The dems who worship at the alter of purple bankclimber mussels and redwood forests. The eco-fundies rule your party and will be the cause of its demise next year…bet on it!

By: caroline

caroline — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:53:10 +0000

bb,
The religion talk is going to continue because the GOP is all about religion. What other party has candidates that think religion should be taught as science?

By: David O'Rear

David O'Rear — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 03:04:08 +0000

Actually, what Mr Romney was defending was his right to privacy in his religious beliefs.

See, the GOPers don’t believe that people shouldn’t have to testify to their religious beliefs in order to be considered for high office.

By: bb

bb — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 02:08:18 +0000

Mitt’s speech was one of, if not the best given during this campaign. It should end all negative discussion about his choice of religious belief.

Best line — “Americans acknowledge that liberty is a gift of God, not an indulgence of government.”

What a shame that a candidate in the 21st century must step up to defend his faith in God. Romney did so with class, character and indisputable resolve.

By: David O'Rear

David O'Rear — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:58:58 +0000

I don’t know which is more silly: asking if a Muslim might be considered for a national security post or actually answering it as if a man or woman’s religion would play a part in the selection process.

We already tried faith-based foreign affairs and it just doesn’t work.